2024 was a banner year for Preservation Raleigh, a newly formed non-profit preservation advocacy organization.
In the summer of 2023, a group of former Raleigh Historic District Commissioners, concerned about the growing urgency for a dedicated voice for preservation, gathered at the historic Mecca Restaurant. From this meeting, Preservation Raleigh was born!
Our board members bring a wealth of experience and a deep commitment to all facets of historic preservation including the celebration of events, people, places, and events we are proud of as well as recognizing moments in our history that can be painful or uncomfortable to remember. They include RHDC Commission Chairs, nationally recognized preservation professionals, and active community advocates.
Guided by the mission of “Sustaining Raleigh’s architectural inheritance for everyone’s benefit,” Preservation Raleigh embarked on its inaugural year with enthusiasm and an abiding commitment to our city.
2024 Preservation Raleigh Accomplishments:
Built relationships with City decision-makers, networking with preservation partners, and connecting with like-minded citizens eager to engage “in a conversation with our past about our future.”(National Park Service)
Provided regular educational content through blogs and newsletters designed to provide an easy-to-digest primer, Preservation 101.
Expanded our reach through the supporters drive and welcomed new members to the Preservation Raleigh community.
Celebrated Preservation Month by launching our educational program “Places in Peril.”
Invited supporters to tour the Lamar Hall for our inaugural “Porch Party” proving preservationists know how to have fun and enjoy a stunningly restored Victorian home
Launched our first Hidden Gems tour of the 1912 Glenwood Fire Station (Engine Company Number 4) offering supporters a first-hand experience in the now restored private residence. fascinating tour
Circulated a Candidate’s Questionnaire to Mayoral and City Council candidates and published their responses online informing voters about the candidate’s positions on key preservation issues, including protecting our rich stock of mid-century modern architecture and preserving workforce housing.
We’re incredibly proud of what we accomplished in 2024, and we’re excited to see what 2025 has in store. Please consider this your invitation to join the vital work of Preservation Raleigh. Given the rapid growth of our city, the need for preservation has intensified. Our advocacy efforts embrace differing views around redevelopment and adaptive reuse. From speaking up on behalf of neglected buildings to exploring options for affordable housing, our work is varied and exciting. All are welcome to participate in Sustaining Raleigh’s architectural inheritance for everyone’s benefit.
Get Involved Your support is crucial to our mission. Please consider supporting Preservation Raleigh!
All donations above are tax-deductible, and it will help make a real local impact. We are deeply grateful for your continued support in preserving Raleigh’s architectural heritage.
The City of Raleigh is currently in the midst of its annual budget process for the 2025-2026 fiscal year. This collaborative process involves input from residents, city departments, and the City Council. Putting together the City of Raleigh’s annual operating budget and five-year Capital Improvement Program is a collaborative process. City departments work on the budget year-round, and the process includes public hearings, a Budget Communities Priority Survey, and City Council work sessions.
The Budget and Management Services Department is hosting a series of listening sessions throughout December and January to gather public input on how tax dollars should be allocated. These sessions provide an opportunity for residents to voice their priorities and concerns regarding city services and programs.
At one of these listening sessions on December 10th, Nick Fountain, VP of Preservation Raleigh and a former member of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission (RHDC), presented compelling arguments for increased funding for the RHDC.
Preservation Raleigh urges the City of Raleigh to recognize the critical importance of the RHDC and invest in its success. Increased funding will allow the commission to better fulfill its mission, protect our city’s valuable historic resources, and contribute to a more vibrant, equitable, and sustainable Raleigh for all.
Mr. Fountain highlighted several critical issues facing the RHDC:
Severe Staff Underfunding: The RHDC has been chronically understaffed for over a decade. With a growing number of historic properties and an exponentially expanding city, the current three-person staff is overwhelmed.
Increased Legal Complexities: Legal requirements imposed by the City Attorney have significantly increased the workload and costs for both the RHDC and property owners.
Inadequate Federal Law Compliance: Understaffing hinders the RHDC’s ability to effectively participate in Section 106 reviews, leading to potential violations of federal law.
Threat to Significant Historic Resources: The lack of proper review processes has put landmarks like the Harrison Library and the Oakwood Historic District at risk, as demonstrated by the Bus Rapid Transit and High Speed Rail projects.
Mid-Century Modern Preservation Crisis: Raleigh boasts a significant collection of mid-century modern architecture, a valuable cultural and tourism asset. However, these structures are being demolished at an alarming rate due to insufficient resources for identification, designation, and preservation incentives.
Limited Affordable Housing Solutions: The RHDC’s Revolving Fund, a crucial tool for preserving historic and affordable housing, is severely underfunded. Expanding this fund would empower more residents to become homeowners.
Preservation Raleigh believes that investing in the RHDC is an investment in Raleigh’s future. A well-resourced commission will not only safeguard our city’s irreplaceable history but also contribute to a more vibrant, equitable, and sustainable community for generations to come. We urge the City of Raleigh to prioritize the RHDC’s needs in the upcoming budget deliberations.
Come share your thoughts about the City budget in January for a listening session held at a community center in each district.
Follow the links below to register. Registration is not required for in-person sessions, unless you would like interpretation services (available free of charge at all sessions) and/or child care services (available free of charge at all in-person sessions.)
While residents are invited to attend any of the listening sessions, at least one in-person session is taking place in each district so that everyone has an equal opportunity to attend. To find your district, enter your address in the Services section of our homepage.
Learn more about the budget process. For questions, call 919-996-4270 or email budget@raleighnc.gov.
One of the questions we are frequently asked is “Why did you create a new preservation organization? Didn’t Raleigh already have one?”
As part of our “Preservation 101” series, we’d like to help familiarize you with a few of the various preservation groups working and advocating together in our city, county, state, and country.
Why Preservation Raleigh?
It’s true that Raleigh has had the RHDC for many years, but their role with the city is different, in that they are not able to advocate and they are appointed by the City Council. There are also limits to the kinds of advocacy a city commission can engage in without City Council authorization. In 2023 a group of former commissioners saw that the need for independent city-wide advocacy had become acute. In a collaborative spirit, RHDC Commissioners voted to spin off the non-profit from the Commission, appointed new board members, and then resigned from the non-profit board. The nonprofit’s name was changed to Preservation Raleigh, continuing its tradition of adapting to the times to meet present and future needs. Our board members are experienced in corporate governance and have been actively involved in historic preservation service as RHDC Commission Chairs, nationally-recognized preservation professionals and volunteers, and community advocates.
Other preservation groups work within Wake County and North Carolina in a variety of ways. Read below to learn more about these groups. Preservation Raleigh is working with each of them in some capacity, and welcome future preservation partnerships.
Our Preservation Partners
We are pleased to highlight the groups we are proud to call partners in our efforts to preserve Raleigh’s architectural inheritance.
Raleigh Historic Development Commission
The Raleigh Historic Development Commission serves as the City Council’s official historic preservation advisory body to identify, preserve, protect, and promote Raleigh’s historic resources. Established in 1961, the RHDC consists of twelve members, appointed by the City Council to overlapping two-year terms. Members have a demonstrated interest or training in fields related to historic preservation and reside within the city’s extraterritorial jurisdiction (at least one-quarter must live or own property in designated historic overlay districts or historic landmarks).
Capital Area Preservation, Inc. (CAP) traces its beginnings to the first stirring of a grass roots preservation movement in Raleigh and Wake County of the late 1960s.
Under a partnership arrangement, signed by the County government and CAP in 2003, CAP operates the county’s preservation program and provides staffing services to the Wake County Historic Preservation Commission (WCHPC). Since assuming responsibility for the program, the number of landmarks in the jurisdiction of the WCHPC has increased from 23 to 75.
The Wake County Historical Society was organized in 1957. The mission of the society is to preserve the history of Wake County and to educate the public about the important events that occurred in Wake and surrounding counties. The society offers interesting programs, tours, trips, social events, an annual meeting, and a newsletter. Its projects have helped to preserve and/or restore many historic aspects of Wake County. If one appreciates the past, he or she will be better able to understand the present and influence the future.
Founded in 1939, The Historic Preservation Foundation of North Carolina Inc. (known as Preservation North Carolina or PNC) is North Carolina’s only private nonprofit statewide historic preservation organization. Its mission is saving historic places important to the diverse people of North Carolina. It enjoys a national reputation, having been cited by the National Park Service as “the premier statewide preservation organization of the South, if not the Nation” and the National Trust for Historic Preservation as “the model organization of its kind.” Cathleen Turner is the Regional Director of Preservation North Carolina’s Piedmont Office based in Durham
NC Modernist
North Carolina is one of the largest concentrations of Modernist houses in America! NCModernist is a 501C3 nonprofit educational archive providing donors, volunteers, and advocates information and organization to document, preserve, and promote North Carolina’s legacy of exceptional residential Modernist architecture. NCModernist is an influential community of architecture fans continually hosting wildly popular Modernist events, giving thousands of people access to the most exciting residential architecture past and present. We are the oldest and largest group dedicated to Modernist residential design in North Carolina.
For more than 70 years, the National Trust for Historic Preservation has led the movement to save America’s historic places. A privately funded nonprofit organization, we work to save America’s historic sites; tell the full American story; build stronger communities; and invest in preservation’s future.
The North Carolina Preservation Consortium (NCPC) is an independent, nonprofit, nongovernmental organization dedicated to the preservation of collections in libraries, museums, archives, and historic sites; monuments, memorials, and outdoor art; archaeological sites and collections; historic and cultural architecture; and private collections of family treasures.
The North Carolina State Historic Preservation Office assists private citizens, private institutions, local governments, and agencies of state and federal government in the identification, evaluation, protection, and enhancement of properties significant in North Carolina history and archaeology. The agency carries out state and federal preservation programs and is a section within the Division of Historical Resources, Office of Archives and History, North Carolina Department of Natural and Cultural Resources (NCDNCR). The office serves as the staff of the state historic preservation officer, who is the NCDNCR Deputy Secretary for the Office of Archives and History, and as staff of the North Carolina Historical Commission in the review of state and federal development projects that might affect historic North Carolina properties.
The Office of State Archaeology (OSA) serves North Carolina’s citizens through programs that identify archaeological resources on land and beneath state waters. OSA archaeologists and staff are specialists with decades of academic training and practical experience, which we apply to gather and share knowledge about the vast time range — more than 14,000 years — of North Carolina’s historic experience.
-by contributing candidates for Raleigh Municipal Elections, Fall 2024
Preservation Raleigh is a non-profit organization supported by citizens who care deeply about the preservation of Raleigh’s historic resources. We wish to support like-minded elected officials. The Preservation Raleigh board asked each of the candidates to answer the following six questions:
Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods?
Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II?
Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh?
Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives?
Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts?
Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council?
Below are all responses to our candidate survey received by October 21, 2024.
Survey Respondents:
Please click the name of the candidate to read their responses. Names are in alphabetical order by last name.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Neutral
Having many vintages of housing, including older housing which is typically more affordable, is an important part of affordability. Preservation of older apartment buildings, hotels, etc. makes a lot of sense. Some older single-family neighborhoods pose higher costs of upkeep and repair than their equivalent multi-family complexes. The location of neighborhoods also matters. If they are near transit or in high density prescribed zones, redevelopment into higher use might be a better outcome.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
I would like to learn more about NCODs in particular. Unable to quickly find a map of these online. Not sure how NCOD relates to missing middle.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes Absolutely! I will strongly support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods, as preserving our history is critical to maintaining the cultural fabric of our communities. I have been a vocal advocate for preserving Raleigh’s historical districts, particularly in Southeast Raleigh, where we have faced challenges with overdevelopment and gentrification. For instance, I played an instrumental role in designating Biltmore Hills as a historical neighborhood and have been active in efforts to preserve the Prince Hall District.
I regularly attend Raleigh Historic Development Commission meetings to stay informed about ongoing efforts, demonstrating my long-standing commitment to protecting these important spaces.
As Raleigh grows, it’s important that we balance development with the protection of our historic assets. Preserving these areas not only honors the contributions of the past but also provides educational and cultural benefits to future generations. My advocacy for responsible growth that prioritizes people over profit is in line with this vision.
Moving forward, I will continue to fight against the erosion of historic districts caused by unchecked development, and I will work toward building strategic alliances to ensure that sufficient funding is allocated for identifying and protecting historic neighborhoods.
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? yes
I wholeheartedly support the preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation after World War II. As someone deeply committed to preserving our city’s historic fabric, I believe these post-war structures are invaluable not only for their architectural significance but also for the cultural and historical narratives they represent.
These buildings reflect a critical era in our nation’s history, when innovation, resilience, and a vision for a better future were paramount. The Greatest Generation’s contributions shaped our communities, and their legacy deserves to be honored and preserved. By safeguarding these structures, we maintain a tangible link to the post-war optimism, civic pride, and architectural ingenuity that helped define Raleigh’s growth during that period.
My advocacy for historical neighborhoods like Biltmore Hills and the Prince Hall District, I have championed protecting both the physical spaces and the stories of those who helped shape them. The structures built during this era are part of the broader tapestry that includes African American, working-class, and other historically marginalized communities. By preserving them, we ensure that Raleigh’s growth is not solely about future development but also about honoring the past.
Furthermore, these structures contribute to the character and identity of Raleigh. As the city faces rapid development and gentrification pressures, it is more important than ever to protect these buildings from being lost in the rush to modernize.
I have been very vocal about the city’s failure not only to protect but also to properly tell the history of our communities. Our local history is national history, and it deserves to be treated with the respect and prominence that reflects its importance. It’s not enough to have temporary special exhibits at our local museum or sporadic signage on the streets. We need a comprehensive, permanent approach to telling our city’s story.
We should be able to engage with our history in meaningful, accessible ways every day—not just wait for an exhibit to become available. Our historical structures and the legacies of the people who built them need to be front and center in our community. There is also space for strategic alliances with organizations worldwide that can help us secure the necessary funding for dedicated museums, cultural centers, and other venues where these stories can be told properly.
This effort requires more than just local support; it demands a broader vision. Through partnerships with global organizations and institutions, we can bring in the resources and expertise to create spaces that tell the full, rich story of Raleigh’s history—including its architectural landmarks and cultural heritage—in ways that honor the past while educating future generations.
Preserving these structures is about more than bricks and mortar; it’s about preserving the stories, struggles, and triumphs of those who came before us. I am committed to ensuring that Raleigh does not just protect its history but also tells it—boldly, completely, and proudly—so that both residents and visitors can appreciate the full scope of what makes our city a pivotal part of American history.
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
I absolutely agree that preserving working-class neighborhoods is a crucial tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh. Throughout my advocacy work, I’ve consistently championed equitable development and the protection of communities vulnerable to gentrification and displacement. By preserving working-class neighborhoods, we not only maintain affordable housing options but also safeguard the cultural and historical integrity of our city.
I’ve been vocal about the harmful effects of overdevelopment, which has driven up property taxes and displaced long-term residents, particularly in historically Black and working-class neighborhoods like Southeast Raleigh. Preservation is a proactive way to prevent this, ensuring that families can remain in their homes without being priced out.
Moreover, I believe that responsible growth should prioritize people over profit, and preserving these neighborhoods helps achieve that balance. It also allows us to develop strategic partnerships with organizations that share our goal of maintaining affordable housing, while respecting the history and contributions of working-class communities.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? yes
Special status is NECESSARY. These architectural landmarks are a key part of our city’s identity and cultural history. Protecting them not only preserves their unique design but also enhances Raleigh’s reputation as a top location for mid-century modern architecture. Offering incentives for preservation ensures these structures are maintained and celebrated for future generations while also boosting tourism by attracting architecture enthusiasts from around the world.
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? yes
Yes, I will fully support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts. It is essential to protect the character and integrity of these areas by ensuring that new development complements the existing architectural and cultural fabric, preserving their historical significance while allowing for thoughtful, EQUITABLE growth.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? yes
Yes, I will support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission, composed of QUALIFIED citizens appointed by the City Council. However, I believe these citizens need to be better vetted, as my experience has shown that many members tend to be disengaged. Ensuring a more active and informed commission will strengthen our efforts to preserve Raleigh’s historic character effectively.
Thank you for completing our candidate survey. If you have any other comments about historic preservation or the mission of Preservation Raleigh, please share below.
I want to extend my heartfelt gratitude to Preservation Raleigh for your tireless advocacy efforts in protecting our city’s rich history and cultural heritage. Your commitment to preserving Raleigh’s architectural gems is invaluable, and together we can ensure that future generations appreciate the stories and significance of our historic neighborhoods.
As I pursue the mayoral office, I am dedicated to prioritizing preservation and responsible development that respects our past while fostering a vibrant future. I ask for your support in this endeavor. Together, we can create a Raleigh that honors its history and embraces thoughtful growth, ensuring that our unique character is maintained for years to come. Thank you!
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes. I firmly support funding for the identification and preservation of historic resources and neighborhoods in Raleigh. Historic preservation is not just about saving old buildings; it’s about preserving the stories and cultural identities of communities that have shaped the city for generations. Particularly in areas like Southeast Raleigh, which is rich in African-American history, identifying and protecting these historic resources is crucial to preserving the cultural heritage that contributes to the city’s diversity.
Why It Matters Research shows that historic preservation has tangible economic and social benefits. According to a study by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, historic districts generally experience higher property values and slower rates of decline compared to non-preserved areas. In Raleigh, historic preservation can protect communities from rapid displacement by market pressures, particularly in areas like Southeast Raleigh, where gentrification has pushed long-time residents out at alarming rates. Preserving these neighborhoods ensures that the legacy of the people who built these communities is not erased in the name of growth.
Southeast Raleigh, for instance, is home to numerous historically Black churches, schools, and homes that represent a critical part of the African-American experience in Raleigh and North Carolina. Identifying and preserving these resources would ensure that future generations understand the struggles and triumphs that have shaped Raleigh’s identity. By securing funding for these efforts, we can prioritize the retention of culturally significant landmarks and ensure that the narrative of Raleigh includes everyone, particularly the communities that have often been marginalized.
Investing in the preservation of historic neighborhoods can also promote local tourism, create jobs, and increase community pride. Studies have shown that heritage tourism—tourism focused on history and culture—generates significant revenue. For instance, North Carolina’s heritage tourism industry generates more than $6 billion annually and supports over 300,000 jobs statewide. Additionally, preserving historic properties can provide affordable housing solutions by maintaining naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH) stock, which is increasingly under threat from redevelopment.
For this to be effective, there must be strict accountability and enforcement mechanisms in place. We have seen instances where agreements around affordability or historic preservation have been weakened or disregarded once projects matured. By securing public funding and accountability measures, we can ensure that historic preservation is not just a talking point but a lived reality for all communities in Raleigh.
In summary, supporting funding for the identification of historic resources is not only a commitment to preserving Raleigh’s past but also an investment in the city’s future. Through responsible leadership and community engagement, we can ensure that Raleigh’s growth does not come at the expense of its history.
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes. I fully support the preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation after World War II. These structures represent an important chapter in Raleigh’s architectural and social history, reflecting the growth and development of the city during the post-war boom. The architectural styles of this era, including mid-century modern homes and commercial buildings, not only highlight the innovation of the time but also tell the story of Raleigh’s transformation from a small Southern city into a thriving hub of culture and commerce. Preserving these buildings honors the legacy of those who laid the foundation for today’s Raleigh.
Furthermore, research indicates that preserving post-war architecture offers economic and social benefits. A study by Place Economics shows that historic preservation can drive economic growth by increasing property values, promoting local tourism, and creating jobs. In North Carolina, heritage tourism generates billions in revenue, supporting community pride and economic stability. By preserving these post-war structures, we safeguard the architectural diversity that gives Raleigh its unique character and ensure future generations can appreciate the contributions of the Greatest Generation.
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. I strongly believe that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is a critical tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh. Historic working-class neighborhoods are often composed of naturally occurring affordable housing (NOAH), which remains accessible to low- and middle-income residents without the need for significant subsidies or government intervention. Preserving these neighborhoods not only maintains the character and cultural history of the community but also provides a buffer against the rapid displacement caused by gentrification. Studies show that when working-class neighborhoods are protected through preservation efforts, they serve as stabilizing forces in cities, maintaining affordability while fostering community cohesion. For example, in cities like Philadelphia, preservation initiatives have shown that protecting these neighborhoods can slow the trend of rising rents and housing costs.
Moreover, preserving working-class neighborhoods is a sustainable approach to housing affordability because it leverages existing infrastructure. Research from the National Trust for Historic Preservation shows that neighborhoods with older, smaller buildings tend to foster a more inclusive environment, attracting a diverse range of businesses, residents, and cultural activities. This diversity drives economic vitality while maintaining affordability for long-term residents. In Raleigh, with housing prices increasing by 16.7% in 2022 alone, the city cannot afford to lose these essential housing options. By investing in preservation, we can protect both the affordability and historical integrity of Raleigh’s most vulnerable communities, ensuring that all residents have the opportunity to stay in the city they call home.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes. I fully support giving special status and preservation incentives for Raleigh’s mid-century modern architecture. Raleigh’s unique position as one of the top three locations in the U.S. for mid-century modern design, alongside Chicago and Los Angeles, speaks to the city’s rich architectural heritage. Iconic buildings such as Dorton Arena and the Catalano House highlight how Raleigh has long embraced innovative design principles. These structures represent a time when the city was forward-thinking in its planning and development, making them invaluable cultural assets. Research indicates that preserving such architectural landmarks not only protects the city’s history but also serves as an economic engine. According to a report by the National Trust for Historic Preservation, cities that invest in the protection of historic assets often see increased property values, boosted tourism, and vibrant community engagement.
Furthermore, offering preservation incentives for mid-century modern architecture can help protect these spaces from the growing pressure of development. Raleigh is experiencing rapid growth, with a population increase of 25% over the past decade, placing historic structures at risk of demolition. Incentives such as tax credits or grants for preservation can encourage property owners to maintain and restore these buildings rather than sell them to developers. Other cities, like Palm Springs, have successfully implemented such measures, leading to the preservation of their mid-century architectural identity while simultaneously fostering economic growth. For Raleigh, protecting these architectural treasures is not just about preserving the past—it’s about shaping a future where history, culture, and progress coexist harmoniously.
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes. I fully support and will insist upon context-sensitive development within Historic Overlay Districts (HODs) and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts (NCODs). Raleigh’s historic districts, such as Oakwood and Boylan Heights, serve as vital connections to our city’s cultural and architectural past. Context-sensitive development ensures that while new developments occur, they respect the scale, character, and aesthetics of these historically significant areas. Research shows that overlay districts protect the identity of neighborhoods while allowing for thoughtful growth. A report by the National Trust for Historic Preservation notes that homes in historic districts often appreciate at a faster rate than in non-designated areas, making preservation a valuable economic and cultural asset.
Additionally, context-sensitive development is crucial for maintaining neighborhood character, which contributes to the overall sense of community and belonging. Studies have found that Raleigh’s NCODs, such as the Cameron Park neighborhood, help maintain affordability by controlling the size and types of development. By focusing on preserving neighborhood features such as setbacks, lot sizes, and building heights, we can prevent the displacement of long-standing residents while allowing new development to meet growing housing needs. As Raleigh continues to expand, ensuring development respects the character of our historic districts is essential for fostering inclusivity and maintaining the unique identity of these neighborhoods.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes. I fully support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission (RHDC), composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council. The RHDC plays a vital role in ensuring the preservation and integrity of Raleigh’s historic districts and properties. Their expert recommendations are grounded in careful research, public input, and a commitment to maintaining Raleigh’s rich architectural and cultural heritage. Studies have shown that cities with strong historic preservation bodies, like the RHDC, not only preserve their unique history but also bolster local economies. According to the National Trust for Historic Preservation, heritage tourism generates $171 billion annually in the U.S., with local preservation efforts directly contributing to economic growth by maintaining attractive, vibrant communities.
Supporting the RHDC also aligns with Raleigh’s broader goals of promoting sustainable and equitable development. Research suggests that preserving historic districts helps maintain affordability and diversity in housing options, which is crucial as Raleigh faces increasing development pressure. For example, a 2014 study by the Urban Land Institute found that cities with strong preservation policies saw more stable property values and fewer instances of gentrification. By backing the RHDC’s recommendations, we ensure that Raleigh’s growth is balanced with the need to protect its history and maintain inclusive, thriving neighborhoods for all residents.
Thank you for completing our candidate survey. If you have any other comments about historic preservation or the mission of Preservation Raleigh, please share below.
As Raleigh continues to experience rapid growth, it is crucial that the city takes intentional steps to preserve the rich Black history of Southeast Raleigh, particularly the legacy of institutions like St. Augustine’s University. Southeast Raleigh has long been a cultural and historical cornerstone for the Black community, contributing significantly to the city’s identity. St. Augustine’s, founded in 1867 by Episcopal clergy to educate newly freed enslaved individuals, represents the resilience and progress of African Americans in the post-Civil War era. In this time of tremendous development, Raleigh must prioritize maintaining the character and stories of these communities. The preservation of these historical narratives is essential not only to honor the past but also to educate future generations about the pivotal role Black leaders, institutions, and neighborhoods played in shaping the city. Without intentional preservation, the cultural fabric of Southeast Raleigh risks being overshadowed by new developments and market pressures, leading to displacement and erasure of Black history.
Raleigh’s ongoing growth brings opportunities, but it also threatens historically significant areas. The need to preserve landmarks such as St. Augustine’s University and the surrounding neighborhoods is critical to protecting the cultural heritage that continues to influence the city’s identity today. As cities like Washington, D.C. and Atlanta have demonstrated, preservation efforts can coexist with urban development. A concerted effort to protect Southeast Raleigh’s historical sites can serve as a model for maintaining affordable housing while safeguarding historical landmarks, ensuring that the region’s Black history remains central to Raleigh’s future.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Neutral. I’m unsure of the nature of “context sensitive development”.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council?Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes, and I wish more folks before us would have done the same. We have lost so many significant and contributing structures in Raleigh over time. We must protect what is left.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes, and I have supported creation of a naturally occurring affordable housing fund to acquire and preserve certain properties. We can do more and add more funding to this initiative.
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes, I would also like to work closer with your group on educating the public about these districts. I believe there is a lot of misinformation, even I was wrong about certain aspects.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council?
Historic preservation is a personal interest. I often look at old pictures of Raleigh and lament the loss of so many buildings over time. Worse, most of those buildings were demolished for surface parking lots. We must preserve what historic and unique places we have left, or we risk becoming a bland, homogeneous city. I am committed to learning more and being a better partner in this work.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes, and we should find significantly more city money for education and identification around historic Black neighborhoods.
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. This is an area where Raleigh has been notoriously weak. Preserving naturally occurring affordable housing and using every tool we have to slow gentrification and displacement should be one of our primary objectives as a city.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Neutral. I am in favor of preserving our historic neighborhoods… I am against missing middle policies.
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Neutral
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. I am for home ownership. We can build affordable neighborhoods by giving up unused city property and working with nonprofits to implement a Habitat for Humanity type program so low income families can own homes in the downtown area and outside.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes. I am for preserving a reasonable number of historic architecture in Raleigh in the downtown area.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Neutral. This can be accomplished through zoning. As a professional planner, I would evaluate individual preservation requests on a case-by-case basis with input from the community.
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. Preserving affordable neighborhoods through zoning is one tool we can use to encourage affordability and protect historically marginalized communities.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Neutral. This is accomplished through zoning, including Historic Conservation Overlay Districts which I have been a proponent of. I would need to learn more about the proposed preservation incentives before responding.
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Neutral. I support using Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts to preserve neighborhood character. I would need to learn more about proposals to regulate context-sensitive design outside of the zoning ordinance.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes. Commission recommendations are advisory but must be seriously considered by the City Council. I would also work to ensure the Council appoints qualified citizens who can speak to the significance of historical sites and engage with the community to center the voices of those closest to the history of places and spaces.
Thank you for completing our candidate survey. If you have any other comments about historic preservation or the mission of Preservation Raleigh, please share below.
Throughout my career as a planner, I have advocated for the preservation of historic sites and the creation of cultural districts to recognize sacred spaces, places, and events. Early in my planning career, I successfully advocated for preserving the Audubon Ballroom in Northern Manhattan when it was proposed to be torn down. As New York City Parks Commissioner, I worked with the Obama administration to designate the Stonewall Inn, Christopher Park, and nearby streets as a national monument to recognize and preserve LGBTQ+ history. As Raleigh’s Planning Director, I staffed the Raleigh Historic District Commission, worked on the Historic District’s chapter of the Comprehensive Plan, and developed a program to install brown street signs to recognize Raleigh’s Historic Districts.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes. Preserving Raleigh’s beloved landmarks has become too difficult. Iconic places like Char-Grill and Seaboard Station are pillars of our city’s identity. Yet, without official historic designation, these landmarks remain vulnerable to redevelopment pressures. We need to simplify the historic designation process and provide support to property owners seeking that status. By doing this, we can genuinely preserve the cultural treasures that make Raleigh special. Since being elected to the city council, I’ve focused on sustainable development. I continue to prioritize smart investment in infrastructure, affordable housing, and public transportation to keep Raleigh livable (and accessible) for everyone as our city continues to expand — I do not believe this should come at the cost of landmarks we’ve deemed protected for historical preservation.
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes, I absolutely support preserving residential and commercial structures that are culturally, historically, and aesthetically important. A population boom like we’re seeing across our city has led to a need to build homes, amenities, and infrastructure, and it’s brought us to a really challenging crossroads. Raleigh’s rapid growth brings incredible opportunities, but it also places pressure on our historic neighborhoods. We can strike a balance, though. I believe we can continue to grow while honoring the past, ensuring that our development decisions respect the significance of these structures. By preserving our buildings, we don’t just maintain Raleigh’s character — we honor the generations who came before us and laid the foundation for the thriving city we are today. I’m committed to a future where progress and preservation walk hand in hand, making Raleigh a city that grows responsibly while holding on to what makes it special.
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. Increasing affordable homeownership and preventing resident displacement is one of the greatest challenges facing our city. One way we can work toward these goals is by working to help preserve Raleigh’s working-class neighborhoods. One avenue we can invest more in is home rehabilitation programs. We know that aging homeowners — homeowners who have lived in Raleigh for decades — face unexpected costs like those that improve accessibility and safety, which ultimately allow them to remain in their homes. If we can subsidize, or at least reduce the burden of these costs, we can empower people to stay in their homes and remain independent. We also need to bring more stability to property taxes. Working families are already stretching every dollar, and unpredictable, ad-hoc tax increases only make it harder for them to plan for the future. That’s why one of my top priorities is pushing for a steady-state budgeting approach. It’s not just about smarter financial planning, it’s about making sure homeowners aren’t priced out of the communities they love. Keeping homeownership affordable and preventing displacement in Raleigh aren’t easy tasks, but it’s what people deserve.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes. I have deep respect for the extensive public processes that neighbors and city staff engage in to create Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts (NCODs) and Historic Overlay Districts (HODs). Their efforts reflect the values and priorities of our communities, and I’ve worked hard to ensure that our land use decisions honor the spirit of these plans whenever possible. For example, during the New Bern Avenue rezoning, we made it a priority to preserve the integrity of areas with NCODs, recognizing the importance of maintaining the provisions that the community fought hard to put in place. We must also acknowledge that neighborhoods evolve. People move in and out, homes are passed down through generations, and priorities shift. While one generation might prioritize the pitch of roofs, the next may be more concerned about setbacks or other aspects of their neighborhood’s character. That’s why I support developing a process to periodically review and update these documents so that they can evolve along with our city. I envision doing this in tandem with our comprehensive plan updates, allowing community leaders to reassess every decade or so whether the provisions of their NCOD or HOD still align with the needs and desires of their residents. This approach would ensure that our neighborhoods continue to reflect the values of the people who live in them, while also preserving our history and architecture.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes. I believe that collaboration is at the heart of smart, thoughtful governance, and diverse perspectives are essential for shaping public policy. During my time on the Raleigh City Council, I’ve made it a point to engage with groups that are making a real difference, and the Raleigh Historic Development Commission is one of those groups. Their work in preserving Raleigh’s unique character is invaluable, and their insights are critical as we make decisions that balance honoring our past with planning for our future. I’ve always viewed feedback as both a gift and a responsibility. If re-elected, I’m committed to working closely with the Raleigh Historic Development Commission, listening to their recommendations, and ensuring their voices are front and center in the decision-making process. Raleigh’s history is one of our greatest assets, and together we can continue to preserve it in a way that strengthens our community.
Thank you for completing our candidate survey. If you have any other comments about historic preservation or the mission of Preservation Raleigh, please share below. The past two years have been the honor of a lifetime. I am proud of the big and small ways I’ve been able to serve the residents of Raleigh, and grateful to have been surrounded by so many folks — like the people at Preservation Raleigh — who also want to be of service. I believe I’ve governed in line with the values I ran on and I will again in the term ahead. I know Raleigh can be a city for everyone — one with ample affordable housing, one with an eye to climate justice, one where residents feel confident their government has their back, and one that values its history. I work hard to listen to all voices and find opportunities for compromise — to govern in a way that values the experience of long-term residents while making room for newcomers. I remain open to and engaged with my constituents, and I look forward to the opportunity to continue shaping our incredible city.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes. Identifying and documenting historic resources and neighborhoods is essential for preserving Raleigh’s legacy. By understanding what remains and who owns it, we can prevent loss and ensure that Raleigh’s history is passed on to future generations
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes. Many properties from the post-World War II era hold significance, particularly with connections to the Jim Crow Era and Civil Rights movement. I would be open to understanding the historical value of such structures. For residential properties, safety and condition are key concerns, and ownership—whether governmental or private—plays a role in restoration possibilities.
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. I lean toward yes, but I would like to discuss how much of a neighborhood’s original character needs to be preserved. We also need to consider the rights of property owners who may wish to rebuild on their land. Is the goal to prevent outside redevelopment, or does this also apply to individuals redeveloping their own property?
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes. We’ve already worked with city staff to use data-driven approaches for implementing sidewalks and filling existing gaps. Currently, we’re updating our bike implementation and design program to create a more equitable system. I will continue working with the community and staff to enhance Raleigh’s multimodal transit system, including improving bus service and addressing areas with limited access.
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes. I support context-sensitive development and believe that educating the community about their options within Historic Overlay and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts is key. We should also review our NCODs to ensure they are still serving the communities they were meant to protect, especially as building codes and policies have changed over time. Evaluating their impact on affordability is important.
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Neutral. I understand that the RHDC may feel limited by existing rules, but I believe in supporting their recommendations. As subject matter experts, their input is invaluable for ensuring that Raleigh’s historic preservation efforts are well-guided.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes, as long as the structures are sound.
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes. Many of the working class are unable to afford rent or housing in their neighborhoods.
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Neutral. Would certainly be interested in listening to recommendations. It is difficult to say “Yes” to all recommendations without knowing what they are.
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
1. Will you support funding for the identification of historic resources and neighborhoods? Yes
2. Understanding that we all stand on the shoulders of those who came before us, do you support preservation of representative residential and commercial structures designed and built by architects and others of the Greatest Generation during the years after World War II? Yes
3. Do you agree that the preservation of working-class neighborhoods is an effective tool for maintaining affordable housing in Raleigh? Yes
4. Raleigh is one of the top three locations in the US (after Chicago and Los Angeles) for mid-century modern design. Would you support special status for such places and preservation incentives? Yes
5. Will you support and insist upon context-sensitive development in Historic Overlay Districts and Neighborhood Conservation Overlay Districts? Yes
6. Are you willing to support the recommendations of the Raleigh Historic Development Commission composed of qualified citizens appointed by the City Council? Yes
As a little girl, I lived at 523 S. Wilmington Street in Raleigh, North Carolina. Wilmington Street was the beginning of the Third Ward, our Black community. On the five hundred block of Wilmington was St. Ambrose Church and Parsonage. Dr. Manassa Pope and his family also lived there at 511 S. Wilmington Street. Dr. Pope was the first Black doctor in North Carolina, graduating from Shaw University Medical School. His diploma from Shaw University is still at the house. His second wife, Mrs. Delia, had two daughters, Evelyn and Ruth. When my mom wanted to go shopping or visiting, she would leave me with them. Mrs. Delia was a teacher and hairdresser. She had attended hairdressing school under Madam C. J. Walker. My hair was long and thick, and my mom didn’t like doing it, so she would ask Mrs. Delia to do my hair.
Stronachs Alley ran down the side of the Pope House and McCauley private Black hospital. Along Stronachs Alley, on both sides, were what are now called Shotgun Houses. This meant you could shoot through the front door and the shot would go straight out the back door. In this area, we had Black, white, and other nationalities.
Next door to the Pope’s was Dr. Lewyn McCauley’s private Black hospital. It was his office and had rooms for the hospital. Next to the hospital was a rooming house where Black people who needed a single room and shared bathroom with no kitchen facilities could live. Next was The Barnes Motor and Parts store, open to everyone.
Then there was 523 S. Wilmington Street, the house I was living in that had belonged to my mother’s sister, Alverda Boyer Fleming. She was married to Harper Fleming, a Black dentist. His office was in the Masonic building at 427 S. Blount Street. I also went to my dentist, Dr. Robert Bell, in the same location when I was growing up. On the corner next to my house was a brick building that ran all the way from Wilmington to Blount Street, facing Lenoir Street. This was used to house tobacco and cotton. Auctions were held in this building for other food products as well.
Front of the Pope House Museum, photo from City of Raleigh
In front of our house faced the back of the white family homes facing Fayetteville Street. The children could play together but could not go into each other’s homes. We, the children, didn’t know any better about playing with each other until we went to school. Everything outside of our neighborhood was segregated. Our Black parents and grandparents taught us that we had our place, and we could not forget it.
The only home left of this community is Dr. Manassa Pope’s home, built in 1900. It is now a museum run by the City of Raleigh and is a reminder of the vibrant community of my earlier life.
A Corner of Cabarrus and Wilmington
Now, just around the corner of Cabarrus and Wilmington Streets, is my second neighborhood, which is in a little better shape, but it is fading fast. Behind St. Ambrose Church on the one hundred blocks of E. Cabarrus Street were family homes and the Lincoln Theater. As children, we would go on Saturday mornings for cartoons from nine to noon for about 10 to 15 cents. It also had other movies, then the theater became Gillies, a Black restaurant and club run by Roy Hicks. Now it is called Lincoln Theatre again, and is a rock-oriented music club.
In the same building was Dove’s Music Box Co. Mr. Arthur Dove carried the most jukeboxes for Black businesses all over the state. Next to that was the ABC store for Black patrons, run by Mr. Cutten Hunt.
Gillie’s, the downtown Raleigh club that featured rope swings around the bar instead of stools. Credit: State Archives of North Carolina and N&O article.
On the corner of E. Cabarrus and S. Blount was a Black-owned Shell or Exxon station (I can’t remember which) run by Mr. Lockhart. He was the husband of Mrs. Nora Lockhart, principal of Crosby-Garfield School. In later years, Mr. Evans owned the service station. This station used to come out and fill the tank, wash all the windows, and check the oil. By our standards today, this was “great service.” The station assumed the whole corner of Blount and Cabarrus. Next to that was a two-story building where the Deluxe Cab Stand was housed and was owned by Mr. Wiley Latham. In the rest of this side of the block were family homes.
Prince Hall Masonic Lodge. Photo from State Archives of NC.
Across the street is Tupper Memorial Baptist Church. Rev. Tupper, the first minister, started Shaw University on this site. It is still a Black Baptist church. Across the street is the Masonic Building, which over the years has housed the YWCA, Civetta Beauty College run by Mrs. Pitts, along with several barbershops. Today, it still houses the Masonic Lodge, Eastern Star, a barbershop, a beauty shop, and a thrift store. This building was built by the Black Masons when these groups were segregated.
Shotgun Houses
Next to the church were small shotgun houses. Then there was a small grocery store with people living above it. This building still stands and is used by a Shriner’s group, I believe. Hinton’s Photographer shop was located here for years, run by both father and son. Now this building has been brought back to life by Valerie K. Fields, owner of V-K. Fields & Co. A similar building next door is empty, but work has been done to preserve it. The house next door has been used for families and businesses. The Carolinian newspaper was a tenant at one time. On the corner, this building was the home of Acme Cab Co., a beauty shop, and a corner store.
My cousins, Cheryl and Maria Hickerson, near my house on Cabarrus Street.
Behind Tupper Memorial Baptist Church, and on the side, were family homes of Black families. Where now is a newly constructed home was a store front on the bottom and an apartment on top where renters stayed. Next to this was the Lewis Hotel, later called the Deluxe Hotel. It was one of several Black hotels in the Downtown area. The Deluxe Hotel is listed in one of the editions of the Green Book as a safe place for Black people to stay. My girlfriend, Edna, who was raised at the hotel, and I were taught how to clean rooms, change beds, and throw the dirty linens down the stairs. Her grandmother would wash all the linens in the basement of the hotel. In the back of the hotel and on the sides to the corner were family homes.
Across the street from Tupper Memorial Baptist Church and behind the Masonic building was a two-story house for renters. Next to it, at 213 E. Cabarrus, was the home of Dr. Jones, a pharmacist. His wife, Mrs. Alice, was a schoolteacher. After his death, Mrs. Alice took in single Black teachers who had come to teach in the Raleigh City Schools. This was unusual during the time of segregation. One of the tenants was Dr. John Hope Franklin, a professor at St. Augustine’s College.
At 215 E. Cabarrus was Rev. Milton Haywood, a Baptist minister, and his wife, Zanna, who was in healthcare. Now I lived at 219 E. Cabarrus during my high school years. This house belonged to Rev. George Mial, a Baptist minister. His second wife, Nina Mial, was head of the Laundry at St. Augustine College. This is who I call Grandma. On the corner of Person and Cabarrus Streets, was a white cinder block building with a shoe and barbershop. Presently, there is a Vintage Clothing Store and Coffee shop. Across on the other corner, was Sullivan’s grocery. Today it is a parking lot. There are more stories about the Third Ward, but time will not permit.
Pictured above, my home on Cabarrus Street in 2024.
The Impact of Gentrification As a board member of Preservation Raleigh, I know my neighborhood was self-sufficient and close-knit. Now these two neighborhoods, where I grew up, are hardly recognizable. Just memories of times gone by. It makes me sad to no longer have two neighborhoods that enriched my life and had such an impact on my becoming an adult. Gentrification has left its mark.
Children on the steps of Saint Ambrose Episcopal Church when it was located on Wilmington Street. Edna, highlighted above, has been a lifelong member of Saint Ambrose. The church moved from downtown Raleigh to its present location at 813 Darby Street in the Rochester Heights neighborhood on June 20, 1965.
Gentrification is a complex process that occurs when more affluent residents move into a historically lower-income neighborhood. This often leads to increased property values, redevelopment, and changes in the neighborhood’s character. While it can bring benefits like improved infrastructure and amenities, it can also displace long-time residents due to rising costs. This can hurt the neighborhood’s culture and make people feel like they don’t belong.
Edna Rich-Ballentine
Preserving History
Historic preservation can play an important role in avoiding the negative effects of gentrification. By preserving historic buildings and landmarks, communities can maintain their cultural heritage and sense of place. This can also help local businesses and make the neighborhood feel more connected.
In addition to preserving buildings, historic preservation can also focus on preserving cultural heritage, such as traditions, customs, and stories. This can help to make sure that the history and identity of a neighborhood are not lost to gentrification.
October 1, 2024: As a follow-up to her blog article and the recent discussions of the Prince Hall Historic District, Edna led a fascinating walking tour through the Prince Hall district for a small group of City Council members and friends.
Strolling through Raleigh’s historic districts ,you’re surrounded by beautifully preserved buildings, each with its own story to tell. If you live in one of these areas, there are some special considerations to keep in mind when making changes to your property’s exterior. This article, the third installment in our Preservation 101 series, will guide you through the Certificate of Appropriateness (COA) process, a requirement for any exterior modifications in Raleigh’s historic districts.
Do I Need a COA?
Before starting any exterior work on your property, it’s important to understand if a COA is necessary. Here’s a breakdown:
COA Required: Properties located within a designated General Historic Overlay District (HOD-G), a regulated zone within a Streetside Historic Overlay District (HOD-S), or a Raleigh Historic Landmark (RHL) all require a COA for any exterior changes that modify the appearance or materials of the building.
No COA Required: Maintenance projects and any activity that doesn’t change the material or appearance of your property do not require a COA.
What is the COA Process?
Think of the COA process as a zoning process where you request permission to make changes to your historic property, similar to obtaining a building permit. Your proposal will be reviewed against the City-Council-approved Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and the specific character essay for your district. These documents outline the architectural styles, materials, and overall character that the city aims to preserve within each historic area.
Getting Help with Your COA Application
The city understands that navigating the COA process can be complex. Raleigh City Staff is available to assist applicants with creating an application that meets the guidelines and has a high chance of approval.
Minor vs. Major Works
Most exterior changes are considered Minor Works and can be reviewed and approved by city staff. This type of COA is for projects like repairs, installing storm windows and doors, reshingling a roof, and removing incongruous features.
Major Work is for projects like modifications to building or site elements, construction of new structures, and additions to or demolition of historically significant structures. This requires a decision from the Raleigh Historic Development Commission’s (RHDC) COA Committee at a monthly meeting. Here, they’ll consider your plans against the design guidelines in detail.
The city has posted a work list that enumerates what work is Minor or Major. Find it here: COA List of Work.
The city also offers an additional layer of support for applicants with complicated Major Works. They can request a free consultation with the Design Review Advisory Committee (DRAC). DRAC members are former RHDC COA Committee members who can provide valuable advice on how to refine your design and application to increase your chances of approval.
The COA Hearing
If your COA cannot be approved by staff or is for a major work, it will be presented at a quasi-judicial hearing before the COA Committee of the Raleigh Historic Districts Commission. Here, facts about the proposed changes and the surrounding district are gathered and weighed against the design guidelines. By law, the Commission is biased towards approving COAs unless presented with evidence against it. Statistics show that over 97% of COAs are either approved or approved with conditions.
Preserving Historic Materials
The COA process prioritizes the retention of historic materials wherever possible. Original windows, for example, are often sturdier and more energy-efficient than modern replacements, especially when properly maintained and paired with storm windows. Additionally, they are generally less expensive and easier to repair, contributing to the overall historic character of the district.
Beyond Appearance: How COA Affects Use
It’s important to remember that the COA process is not concerned with the intended use of a property, which is determined by underlying zoning regulations. In some cases, the COA process is also used to review proposals for subdividing or recombining lots within historic districts. Here, the aim is to ensure the resulting lots can be developed in a manner compatible with the design guidelines.
Owning a property in a historic district comes with some additional responsibility, but the COA process is there to guide you. By understanding these guidelines and the available assistance, you can make informed decisions about your property while contributing to the preservation of Raleigh’s historic character. These districts are vibrant communities, and your stewardship helps maintain their unique charm for future generations. a crucial role in identifying and advocating for potential historic districts.
Want to Learn More? Explore the links below or contact Preservation Raleigh and we can help connect you with the right people!
Preservation Raleigh is deeply concerned about the August 20 City Council decision which removed a lot from the Prince Hall local historic district and approved a seven-story hotel. This decision undermines the principles of historic preservation, community planning, and the protection of Black history.
The proposed development, which is significantly taller than any existing structure in the neighborhood, will create a visual and contextual mismatch that will negatively impact the historic character of the district. The City Council’s decision to change the underlying zoning from DX-3-UG w/ HOD-G to DX-12-UG-CU is also a significant departure from the established regulations and guidelines for the area.
Additionally, the final decision was made without adequate public input or consideration of the potential impacts on the historic district and residents. The proposed project is radically inconsistent with the City Council-adopted Design Guidelines for Historic Districts and Landmarks, as well as the 2030 Comprehensive Plan.
We believe that the City Council’s actions are inconsistent with the principles of responsible urban planning and the preservation of Raleigh’s cultural heritage. Furthermore, the City Council’s disregard for the Planning Commission and the Raleigh Historic Development Commission (RHDC) votes is a significant setback for the preservation of Raleigh’s historic resources. Both Commissions had carefully considered the proposed development and voted against the rezoning in its current form.
Preservation Raleigh urges the City Council to reconsider the process by which this decision was reached. We believe that the rushed nature of the final negative votes by the council, the lack of public input on the revised conditions submitted August 16, and the disregard for the recommendations of the Planning Commission and RHDC set a dangerous precedent. Future council decisions regarding historic districts should prioritize transparency, community engagement, and the preservation of Raleigh’s historic, cultural, and architectural assets.
History of the rezoning request – as set forth in the Planning & Development Memo to Council:
History of the rezoning request: On September 5, 2023 City Council opened the public hearing and heard public comment. The public hearing was continued to December 5, 2023, providing the applicant time to pursue a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA). The Raleigh Historic Development Commission took final action during the December 14, 2023 COA Committee meeting but a COA was not granted. At the February 6, 2024 meeting City Council heard from the applicant, who requested a continuation of the hearing until April 2, 2024.
On April 2 the public hearing was continued further to allow RHDC time to provide recommendation on the future of the Prince Hall Historic Overlay District (HOD) boundary. A recommendation on the HOD was requested for this rezoning request to help the Council make a more informed decision. On April 16, 2024 RHDC voted (10-1) to recommend that there be no changes to the boundaries of the Prince Hall HOD and that the Special Character Essay for the district be updated. On May 21, 2024 the public hearing was continued, and the item was referred to committee for further discussion alongside an item discussing the Prince Hall HOD.
This article, the second in Preservation Raleigh’s “Preservation 101” series, delves into the world of local historic districts, exploring the potential benefits and dispelling some common myths.
The Allure of Local Historic Districts
Designation as a local historic district isn’t just about preserving charming streetscapes and architectural gems. It’s a powerful tool for fostering a vibrant community and economic stability. Research consistently shows that historic preservation helps to:
Stabilize property values: Studies indicate that homes within historic districts appreciate at rates exceeding those in non-designated areas.
Stimulate investment: The unique character of historic districts attracts developers and entrepreneurs, leading to revitalization and economic growth.
Raleigh’s Historic Overlay Districts
Raleigh boasts eight distinct local historic districts, HODs, each with its own story to tell. From the stately residences of Blount Street to the vibrant commercial heart of Glenwood-Brooklyn, these districts celebrate the city’s rich architectural heritage. The local historic districts in Raleigh include: Blount Street, Boylan Heights, Capitol Square, Moore Square, Oakwood, Prince Hall, Glenwood-Brooklyn, and Oberlin Village.
The Raleigh Historic Development Commission (RHDC) plays a crucial role in identifying and advocating for potential historic districts.
Designation Process
A local historic district designation request may be generated by the community or RHDC. Generally, a local historic district nomination is submitted to staff, reviewed by the RHDC, and sent to the NC State Historic Preservation Office for initial review. The next stage of the process includes a public review of the nomination, which includes press release, notification to property owners within and adjacent to the district, an architectural study, public meetings, and a community vote. Upon completion of community review, RHDC may recommend the nomination to City Council for consideration and potential designation. Currently, the Mordecai Place neighborhood is involved in a stalled historic designation process.
Following designation, properties located within local historic districts are subject to an architectural and landscape design review process administered by the RHDC. The commission’s Design Guidelines assist property owners or stewards in modifying historic district properties while retaining historic character, resulting in the issuance of a Certificate of Appropriateness (COA).
Stay tuned for our next blog article which will feature detailed information about the COA process.
Prince Hall: A Case Study in Significance
Let’s take a closer look at Prince Hall, a historic district rich in cultural significance, and one that is currently under discussion. Beyond its architectural beauty, Prince Hall holds a place of national importance. It was the heart of Raleigh’s thriving Black community following the Civil War, and it played a pivotal role in the Civil Rights Movement. Prince Hall served as the birthplace of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), a pivotal organization in the struggle for equality.
Busting the Myths: Infill and Design Flexibility
One concern regarding historic districts is their potential impact on development. A common misconception is that historic designation stifles new construction or infill within the district.
The reality? Historic districts allow for a healthy balance between preservation and responsible development. Raleigh’s Historic Design Guidelines, for example, use the term “congruity” rather than “compliance.” This allows for flexibility in design, encouraging new construction that complements the existing historic character. Sections 3.4 and 3.5 of the guidelines specifically address non-residential additions and new construction, providing clear parameters for responsible development.
The guidelines even encourage the incorporation of contemporary design elements, as long as these elements are harmonious with the overall character of the district. Ultimately, the aim is to preserve the district’s unique spirit, not to freeze it in time.
Raleigh’s design guidelines are considered a national model for their adaptability and effectiveness. While there’s always room for improvement, the current system provides a solid foundation for responsible development within historic districts.
Vacant Lots and the Power of Certainty
The issue of vacant lots within historic districts is another concern. The guidelines are designed to ensure that infill development respects the existing character. This protects residents from the potential eyesores of out-of-place McMansions.
However, a focus on vacant lots can have unintended consequences. Single-family lots inside the beltline are a valuable and limited resource. Focusing solely on them could drive up prices, hindering development opportunities.
The Infill Reality
Claims that historic designation hinders development are simply not supported by evidence. The slowdown in infill projects across Raleigh in recent years is more likely linked to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic – rising construction costs, material shortages, and economic uncertainty.
What Control is Lost Through Local Historic Designation?
Very little. This is a trade-off where the homeowner gives some control over the exterior of their property in return for the stability that comes from knowing that the surrounding properties are stable or will be improved within the existing neighborhood character.
Must Infill in a Historic District Copy Historic Styles?
No. In fact, the Design Guidelines encourage infill that is compatible in character and form with the historic properties, but discernible from those historic properties.
Modern infill in the Prince Hall HOD
Are Local Historic Districts Frozen in Time?
No. A review of Real Estate records of properties within historic districts with properties of a similar age outside of historic districts shows that there is more change within the historic districts than outside the districts. That change retains the character of the district, making it virtually invisible to the casual observer.
Who Are These People on Raleigh Historic Development Commission?
They are Raleigh citizens, just like you, appointed by the City Council for their expertise in historic preservation, architecture, history, construction, development, or related topics. They receive training on the preservation process and the governing state laws. They are in no way like a homeowner’s association. Anything they undertake is from their city-council-approved work program, and all decisions they make must have a basis in facts, not opinion. The commissioners are from all over Raleigh, and no neighborhood dominates the commission.
Property Values: Fact vs. Fiction
Another myth suggests that historic designation hurts property values. However, studies consistently show the opposite. Properties located within historic districts tend to hold their value or even appreciate at a faster rate than those outside of the district.
The only scenario where historic designation might potentially impact property value would involve a situation where the designation is accompanied by downzoning (reducing allowable development density). Even then, if you look at a property in the Wake County real estate database within a historic district and you look at a similar property immediately outside of the historic district you will see the property value within the district is the same or higher than the properties outside of the historic district.
Seeing is Believing: Infill Success Stories
Let’s look at the thriving Oakwood neighborhood as an example. Despite its historic designation, Oakwood boasts numerous successful infill projects, seamlessly blending with the existing architectural fabric.
A contemporary infill structure at the corner of N East and Franklin in Oakwood.Infill woven seamlessly into the Oakwood neighborhood, near N Bloodworth and BoundaryAnother example of infill on Boundary Street in Oakwood.Drive down Watauga Street between Boundary and Polk in Oakwood. Nearly all the structures on both sides of the street are successful infill projects. The same is true for most of the houses on the east side of Elm Street between Boundary and Polk in Oakwood. There are dozens of other examples.
These examples demonstrate that historic districts and responsible development can coexist.
Oakwood is a stunning example of the positive impact of Local Historic Designation. We think of it as the pretty, wealthy, downtown community that we see today. It was not always that way. It was a run-down neighborhood that hosted drug dealing and prostitution in its many structures that were carved up into rooming houses and half-way houses. It was in much worse straits than pretty much any neighborhood in Raleigh is in today. Initially, a group of visionary pioneers saw its potential and started restoring homes mostly with sweat equity. Historic designation offered a sense of stability that made further, broader, reinvestment possible.
Conclusion: A Balanced Approach for a Thriving Raleigh
The debate surrounding local historic districts can be passionate. Preservation Raleigh encourages a fact-based approach. Local historic designation is a powerful tool for maintaining Raleigh’s unique character, fostering economic growth, and ensuring a vibrant future for our city.
Want to Learn More? Explore the links below or contact Preservation Raleigh and we can help connect you with the right people!
What does the term “landmarking” mean? If you’ve ever chatted with historic preservationists, you might have heard the term used. Landmarking simply refers to the process of landmark designation for historic properties. These properties usually have historic markers posted near the entrances.
Here, in the first of our “Preservation 101” series, Preservation Raleigh delves into the world of historic designation. Our goal? To empower everyone to learn more about historic preservation and the role it plays in our communities.
Landmarking is the formal recognition of a property’s historical, architectural, cultural, or archaeological significance. This recognition can occur at various levels in North Carolina:
Local: Designation by a municipality or county historic preservation commission.
National: Inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places, administered by the U.S. Department of the Interior.
The designation journey and the specific benefits can vary depending on the level. However, the goal remains the same: to celebrate and safeguard our architectural heritage for future generations.
Understanding Local Landmarks vs. National Register Listing
First, let’s clear up a common misconception. Local designation is different from being listed on the National Register of Historic Places. The National Register, administered by the federal government, recognizes properties with historical, architectural, archaeological, or cultural value and helps to protect them from threats from federal or federally-assisted projects. In contrast, local designation acknowledges a historic property’s significance and provides protection from inappropriate alterations or from demolition (for one year).
While some properties may hold both designations, they are entirely separate programs with different criteria and benefits.
Either designation depends on the special significance of the property. An owner may consult with local or national representatives to see if their property is eligible.
The Power of Local Commissions
Local historic designations are spearheaded by local historic preservation commissions. These commissions, established by counties or municipalities, help identify potential landmarks, conduct research, and ultimately recommend properties for designation to the local governing board (city council or county commissioners).
The Designation Journey: From Research to Recognition
So, how does a property become locally designated? The process typically begins with the commission identifying a building, structure, site, area, or even an object with potential historical significance. They delve into the property’s history, documenting its architectural style, past uses, and its contribution to the community’s narrative. This research culminates in a local designation report.
Once the commission finalizes its recommendation, the local governing board and the commission hold a public hearing. This is an opportunity for the community to voice their opinions on the proposed designation. Following the public hearing, if the governing board approves, an ordinance is passed, officially recognizing the property as a local historic landmark.
The Rewards of Designation
Local designation is an honor bestowed upon a property by the community, acknowledging its historical significance and value. For individual landmark owners, this recognition comes with a significant perk – eligibility for an annual 50% property tax deferral. However, maintaining the property’s historic features is a requirement to retain this benefit.
Preserving the Past, Shaping the Future
A crucial aspect of local designation involves ensuring that alterations to designated properties are appropriate and respectful of their historical character. This is where certificates of appropriateness come in. Owners of landmarks must obtain these certificates from the preservation commission before undertaking significant changes, additions, or new construction. The commission reviews proposed changes based on established design guidelines, ensuring any modifications complement the property’s historic significance.
These design guidelines are a valuable resource for property owners as well. They can be used to plan renovations and discuss potential projects with the commission, fostering collaboration and ensuring historically sensitive improvements.
The Raleigh Example: Protecting the City’s Story
Let’s take a closer look at how landmark designation works in Raleigh. The Raleigh Historic Development Commission recommends properties for designation to the City Council, which then holds a public hearing before potentially landmarking a property. Raleigh designation provides a powerful tool to prevent demolition of historically significant structures while offering property owners substantial tax advantages. For this reason it is not undertaken lighting or without public input and support.
Raleigh Historic Development Commission (RHDC) designation process:
Research & Public Input:
The RHDC’s Research Committee gathers information about the property.
Public meetings and hearings are held to solicit community input.
Comments are obtained from the State Historic Preservation Office.
Committee Review:
The Research Committee reviews the findings and public input.
If the designation has merit and community support, it’s recommended to the full RHDC.
Public Hearings:
The RHDC holds a public hearing to consider the designation report and receive comments.
A joint public hearing is held with the RHDC and City Council for further public input.
City Council Vote:
City Council holds a final public hearing to vote on landmarking the property.
Why Landmark?
If you are considering landmarking your property in Raleigh, the benefits are numerous:
Public recognition: Your property is acknowledged as an important part of Raleigh’s history.
Tax advantages: Enjoy a significant reduction in property taxes.
Preservation benefits: Gain access to assistance from the RHDC regarding maintenance, repairs, and rehabilitation of your historic property.
Sense of stewardship: Become a vital partner in preserving Raleigh’s architectural inheritance for future generations.
Are you considering landmarking your property, or do you know of a property that would be appropriate for a nomination to the National Register of Historic Places?
Explore the links below or contact Preservation Raleigh and we can help connect you with the right people!
The Ligon House, a once-grand Craftsman-style residence perched on a double lot at 573 E. Lenoir St. in Raleigh, North Carolina, stands as a testament to a prominent family and a pivotal figure in the city’s history. For 75 years, it was the home of the Ligon family, with Rev. Dr. John William Ligon, a respected educator, pastor, and community leader, at its heart. However, the house itself has faced an uncertain future in recent years, swinging from hope for restoration to the despair of neglect.
573 E. Lenoir Street in the background of this 1940 photo. Courtesy State Archives, Borden Collection.
A House Steeped in History
Built around 1914, the Ligon House embodies the classic Craftsman aesthetic. Distinctive features include six-over-one pane windows, an eyebrow dormer, and a welcoming porch supported by characteristic Craftsman-style elements. Early city directories list residents as Daisy Ligon (1914), followed by Rev. J. W. Ligon and his family (1921 onwards). The house was clearly a central point for the Ligons and likely a hub for community gatherings as well.
A Family Rooted in Education and Community
Rev. Dr. John William Ligon was a towering figure in Raleigh’s African American community. Born in Wake County in 1869, he dedicated his life to education, ministry, and civic engagement. He held multiple pastorates and served for over a quarter-century as both teacher and principal in Wake County public schools. His educational pursuits were extensive, culminating in an honorary doctorate of divinity from Shaw University in 1925.
Source: News & Observer, Sept. 1, 1995
Rev. Ligon’s commitment to education extended beyond the classroom walls. He was instrumental in establishing a school for African American children in Raleigh, a crucial step towards educational equity in the segregated South. Nearly three decades after his passing, John W. Ligon High School, named in his honor, opened its doors as the city’s sole Black secondary institution. This school, now known as Ligon Magnet Middle School, continues to serve the community and stands as a lasting tribute to Rev. Ligon’s legacy.
A Fight for Preservation
The Ligon House, however, has not shared the same fate. For the past two decades, the property has endured a cycle of hopeful restoration attempts followed by periods of neglect. As of today, the house remains unoccupied and bears the scars of deferred maintenance. Boarded-up windows and a deteriorating roof create a disheartening image.
Efforts to preserve the house began in the early 2000s. Descendants of Rev. Ligon envisioned the property as “Ligon Square,” a space for office space and community events near Shaw University. While this initiative ultimately fell through, the desire to save the house persisted. In 2007, a coalition led by Bruce Lightner successfully advocated for the house’s reprieve from demolition by the Raleigh City Council.
More recently, in 2021, news reports indicated a new owner, Hoss Holdings LLC, committed to restoring the Ligon House. Initial plans included patching the roof to prevent further damage. However, nearly three years later, the house’s condition remains unchanged, a stark reminder of the ongoing struggle for its preservation.
A Legacy Waiting to be Restored
The Ligon House is more than just a structure; it’s a tangible link to Raleigh’s rich history of African American education and community leadership. It embodies the life and work of Rev. Dr. John William Ligon, a man who dedicated his life to uplifting others. Preserving this house becomes an act of honoring his legacy and ensuring that future generations can learn about this important chapter in Raleigh’s story.
The Ligon House’s future remains uncertain. Will it succumb to neglect, be demolished to make way for development, or will it be moved and restored to its former glory? The answer lies in the hands of the community and its commitment to preserving this irreplaceable piece of Raleigh’s heritage.
The house is a contributing structure within the East Raleigh-South Park National Historic District. It is eligible for state and federal rehabilitation tax credits. If further designated as a Raleigh Historic Landmark, the owner can apply for a 50% city and county property tax deferral.
A Call to Action
The current owner of the Ligon House is Ashkan Hosseini with Hoss Holdings. In talks with the RHDC in 2021, he indicated that he hoped to save the house by moving it to a lot at the corner of Bloodworth Street and Martin Luther King Boulevard. Preservation Raleigh is asking our followers to contact him to encourage him to follow through on this plan.
More Information
For further reading including resource links and a biography of Rev. Ligon, read the full article by Brent A. Pitts:
